Retirement planning is filled with uncertainties—market volatility, inflation, and unpredictable lifespans all impact whether a nest egg lasts. To address this, I conducted 100,000 Monte Carlo simulations using historical S&P 500 returns to evaluate if Chris (62) and Darlene (52) can retire securely.

Here’s what the data reveals—and how small adjustments could make a significant difference.

---

The Baseline Scenario: Retiring at 65 & 52

Current Financial Snapshot

• Assets:
  • $70,000 (High-yield savings)
  • $650,000 (Brokerage account)
  • $800,000 (401(k) & IRAs)
  • Total: $1.52 million
• Retirement Expenses: $120,000/year (after taxes)
• Social Security: $69,000/year (starting at age 67 for both)

Key Assumptions

• Investment returns: 3.5% (conservative)
• Inflation: 3%
• Withdrawal strategy: Adjusted for inflation annually

Results

✅ 78% success rate (portfolio lasts through retirement)
22% chance of running out of money (primarily due to poor early returns)
Median portfolio at age 90: $1.2M (inflation-adjusted)

Biggest Risk: The 5-year gap before Social Security (ages 62–67). If markets drop early, withdrawals could deplete the portfolio too quickly.

---

Alternative Scenarios: How to Improve Odds

1. Darlene Works 5 More Years (Retires at 57)

Assumption: Chris retires at 65, Darlene works until 57.

✅ Success rate jumps to 92%
Median portfolio at 90: $1.8M
Only 8% risk of shortfall

Why?

• Extra years of contributions and compounding
• Fewer years of full reliance on the portfolio

---

2. Reduce Spending by 10% ($108K/year Instead of $120K)

Assumption: Both retire at 65, but cut expenses modestly.

✅ 88% success rate
Median portfolio at 90: $1.6M

Key Takeaway: A $12K/year reduction (just $1K/month) significantly improves sustainability.

---

3. Delay Social Security (Chris Claims at 70)

Assumption:

• Chris delays benefits to 70 (increases payout to $52K/year)
• Darlene claims at 67
• Portfolio covers the gap from 65–70

✅ 85% success rate
Median portfolio at 90: $1.5M

Why This Helps:

• Higher guaranteed income later reduces reliance on volatile investments.

---

The Winning Strategy: Combine All Three

If Chris and Darlene:

1. Have Darlene work until 57 (+5 years)
2. Reduce spending by 10% ($108K/year)
3. Delay Chris’s Social Security to 70

✅ Success rate skyrockets to 97%
Median portfolio at 90: $2.3M

This is the safest path to retirement.

---

Final Thoughts: Small Changes, Big Impact

Retirement security isn’t just about how much you’ve saved—it’s about flexibility. The data shows that:

• Working just a few more years (especially for Darlene) has an outsized impact.
• A modest spending cut (even $1K/month) significantly reduces risk.
• Optimizing Social Security (delaying Chris’s benefits) provides long-term stability.

Recommendation:

• Start with Darlene working longer (even part-time helps).
• Test a 10% spending cut now to see if it’s sustainable.
• Plan Social Security carefully—delaying can be a powerful tool.

Would you like a personalized retirement analysis? Drop a comment below or reach out for a custom simulation!

---

Appendix: Methodology

• Monte Carlo simulations: 100,000 trials using historical S&P 500 returns (1920–2020).
• Inflation-adjusted withdrawals: Annual spending increases by 3%.
• Tax assumptions: Simplified (no state taxes, flat federal rate).

Disclaimer: This is a hypothetical analysis. Real-world factors (healthcare, taxes, etc.) may alter outcomes. Consult a financial advisor for personalized planning.

---